On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 05:59:06AM +0000, Zhang, Chen wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 4:05 PM > > To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zh...@intel.com> > > Cc: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>; qemu-dev <qemu- > > de...@nongnu.org>; Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Eduardo > > Habkost <edua...@habkost.net>; Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>; Markus > > Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>; Peter Maydell > > <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>; Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>; Laurent > > Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>; Yuri Benditovich > > <yuri.benditov...@daynix.com>; Andrew Melnychenko > > <and...@daynix.com> > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] configure: Add iovisor/ubpf project as a > > submodule for QEMU > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 03:36:19PM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: > > > Make iovisor/ubpf project be a git submodule for QEMU. > > > It will auto clone ubpf project when configure QEMU. > > > > I don't think we need todo this. As it is brand new functionality we don't > > have > > any back compat issues. We should just expect the distros to ship ubpf if > > they want their QEMU builds to take advantage of it. > > > > Yes, agree. It's the best way to use the uBPF project. > But current status is distros(ubuntu, RHEL...) does not ship > the iovisor/ubpf like the iovisor/bcc. So I have to do it. > Or do you have any better suggestions?
If distros want to support the functionality, they can add packages for it IMHO. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
