It looks nicer if we separate the run_ccw() from the IPL_assert() statement, and the error message should talk about "virtio device" instead of "block device", since this code is nowadays used for non-block (i.e. network) devices, too.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> --- pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c index d8c2b52710..f37510f312 100644 --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c @@ -289,9 +289,8 @@ void virtio_setup_ccw(VDev *vdev) .num = 0, }; - IPL_assert( - run_ccw(vdev, CCW_CMD_READ_VQ_CONF, &config, sizeof(config), false) == 0, - "Could not get block device VQ configuration"); + rc = run_ccw(vdev, CCW_CMD_READ_VQ_CONF, &config, sizeof(config), false); + IPL_assert(rc == 0, "Could not get virtio device VQ configuration"); info.num = config.num; vring_init(&vdev->vrings[i], &info); vdev->vrings[i].schid = vdev->schid; -- 2.31.1