Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 02:04:41PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...] >> Please rephrase the documentation of @zero-copy-copied in terms of >> @dirty-sync-count. Here's my attempt. >> >> # @zero-copy-copied: Number of times dirty RAM synchronization could not >> # avoid copying zero pages. This is between 0 and >> # @dirty-sync-count. (since 7.1) > > Any one have preferences on the name - i get slight put off by the > repeated word in the property name here. > > @zero-copy-rejects ? > @zero-copy-misses ? > @zero-copy-fails ? I'd consider any of these an improvement. Not a native speaker, but perhaps "failures" instead of "fails". We could also express the connection to @dirty-sync-count right in the name, like @dirty-sync-rejected-zero-copy, @dirty-sync-missed-zero-copy, @dirty-sync-failed-zero-copy. Or maybe -copies.
