>> git bisect says this. I didn't believe it first time, so I ran it >> twice with a few modifications, and it pointed to the same commit both >> times ... > > Richard, > could you please elaborate on your testcase and configuration > (host/target architecture, command lines, etc).
Ok, I've found most of details, what's not clear to me is how you decide whether the build is good or bad. I mean, you need to rebuild qemu on every bisection step, but neither this commit nor the previous or the next one change anything that would compile for x86 targets. >> 67882fd177389527510eb36b3f7712011a835545 is the first bad commit >> commit 67882fd177389527510eb36b3f7712011a835545 >> Author: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> >> Date: Tue Sep 6 03:55:28 2011 +0400 >> >> target-xtensa: implement narrow instructions >> >> Instructions with op0 >= 8 are 2 bytes long, others are 3 bytes long. >> >> Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> >> >> Rich. -- Thanks. -- Max
