在 2022/8/3 01:57, Eugenio Pérez 写道:
Since we're going to allow SVQ to add elements without the guest's
knowledge and without its own VirtQueueElement, it's easier to check if
an element is a valid head checking a different thing than the
VirtQueueElement.
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <epere...@redhat.com>
---
Patch looks good to me. But I spot several other issues:
1) vhost_svq_add() use size_t for in_num and out_num, is this intended?
2) do we need to fail vhost_svq_add() if in_num + out_num == 0?
Thanks
hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
index ffd2b2c972..e6eebd0e8d 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static VirtQueueElement
*vhost_svq_get_buf(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
return NULL;
}
- if (unlikely(!svq->desc_state[used_elem.id].elem)) {
+ if (unlikely(!svq->desc_state[used_elem.id].ndescs)) {
qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
"Device %s says index %u is used, but it was not available",
svq->vdev->name, used_elem.id);
@@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ static VirtQueueElement
*vhost_svq_get_buf(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq,
}
num = svq->desc_state[used_elem.id].ndescs;
+ svq->desc_state[used_elem.id].ndescs = 0;
last_used_chain = vhost_svq_last_desc_of_chain(svq, num, used_elem.id);
svq->desc_next[last_used_chain] = svq->free_head;
svq->free_head = used_elem.id;