On Fri, 2022-09-09 at 15:39 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: ... > looks more or less fine except of excessive use of named variables > which creates global scope variables. > > I'd suggest to store temporary buffers/packages in LocalX variales, > you should be able to do that for everything modulo > aml_create_dword_field(). > > see an example below > ... > > > > + /* > > + * ACPI v6.4: Section 6.5.10 NVDIMM Label Methods > > + */ > > + /* _LSI */ > > + method = aml_method("_LSI", 0, AML_SERIALIZED); > > + com_call = aml_call5(NVDIMM_COMMON_DSM, > > + aml_touuid(NVDIMM_DEVICE_DSM_UUID), > > + aml_int(1), aml_int(4), aml_int(0), > > + aml_int(handle)); > > + aml_append(method, aml_store(com_call, aml_local(0))); > > + > > + aml_append(method, aml_create_dword_field(aml_local(0), > > + aml_int(0), > > "STTS")); > > + aml_append(method, aml_create_dword_field(aml_local(0), > > aml_int(4), > > + "SLSA")); > > + aml_append(method, aml_create_dword_field(aml_local(0), > > aml_int(8), > > + "MAXT")); > > + > > + pkg = aml_package(3); > > + aml_append(pkg, aml_name("STTS")); > > + aml_append(pkg, aml_name("SLSA")); > > + aml_append(pkg, aml_name("MAXT")); > > + aml_append(method, aml_name_decl("RET", pkg)); > > ex: put it in local instead of named variable and return that > the same applies to other named temporary named variables. > Fine, get your point now. In ASL it will look like this: Local1 = Package (0x3) {STTS, SLSA, MAXT} Return (Local1)
But as for CreateDWordField (Local0, Zero, STTS) // Status CreateDWordField (Local0, 0x04, SLSA) // SizeofLSA CreateDWordField (Local0, 0x08, MAXT) // Max Trans I cannot figure out how to substitute with LocalX. Can you shed more light? CreateQWordFieldTerm := CreateQWordField ( SourceBuffer, // TermArg => Buffer ByteIndex, // TermArg => Integer QWordFieldName // NameString ) NameString := <RootChar NamePath> | <ParentPrefixChar PrefixPath NamePath> | NonEmptyNamePath > > + aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_name("RET"))); > > + ... > > + field = aml_create_dword_field(aml_local(3), aml_int(0), > > "STTS"); > > + aml_append(method, field); > > + aml_append(method, > > aml_return(aml_to_integer(aml_name("STTS")))); > > why do you need explicitly convert DWORD field to integer? > it should be fine to return STTS directly (implicit conversion should > take care of the rest) Explicit convert eases my anxiety on uncertainty. ;) > > > + aml_append(nvdimm_dev, method); > > + ...