On 27 December 2011 22:04, Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsd...@calxeda.com> wrote:
> On 12/27/2011 03:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The GIC architectural limit on number of interrupts is 1020;
>> that would (I think) imply a ~64K memory usage by the GIC,
>> which we can live with I think.
>
> I think you just said you wanted me to define the gic internal
> maximum as 1020. I just want to be sure I understood you there.

That's "we should define it as 1020 unless you or somebody else
thinks that's a terrible idea for some reason". Sorry, that was
a bit cryptic.

-- PMM

Reply via email to