On 12/29/2011 07:36 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 29 December 2011 17:26, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 12/29/2011 07:22 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> I think for devices what would be particularly useful would be > >> if you can write a (simple) test for something at the register > >> level, which generates an image which you can run on the real > >> hardware as well as on QEMU. Then you can confirm that your test > >> case is correct. Otherwise the tests are just going to bake in the > >> same assumptions/misconceptions about what the hardware does as > >> the QEMU model. > > > > That is exactly qtest. > > Am I missing something? I looked at the qtest patches and they seem > to work by just prodding the device through qemu function calls, > not by running a guest CPU binary that prods the device.
Sorry, I misread your post. I guess we can point a qtest test at real hardware too, if something like vfio is available to provide access to registers and to hook interrupts. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
