On 12/29/2011 04:18 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > > > > > The issue is how to solve the page fault, not whether TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE > > > or > > > TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. > > > I can think of several options. > > > - When daemon X is dead, all page faults are served by zero pages. > > > - When daemon X is dead, all page faults are resovled as VM_FAULT_SIGBUS > > > - list/reattach: complications. You don't like it > > > - other? > > > > Don't resolve the page fault. It's up to the user/system to make sure > > it happens. qemu can easily do it by watching for the daemon's death > > and respawning it. > > > > When the new daemon is started, it can ask the kernel for a list of > > pending requests, and service them. > > Great, then we agreed with list/reattach basically. > (Maybe identity scheme needs reconsideration.)
I guess we miscommunicated. Why is reattach needed? If you have the fd, nothing else is needed. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
