On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:36:51AM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 9:28 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 08:38:54AM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > > I don't really care where we upload them but only having the > > > > latest version is just going to break anything expecting > > > > the old binary. > > > > > > In fairness, I am not entirely certain if there is a tight coupling > > > between the qemu tests and the bits binaries. I have written the test > > > framework in a way such that test modifications and new tests can be > > > pushed into the bits binaries and the iso gets regenerated with the > > > new tests from QEMU itself before running the tests. Only when we need > > > bits bugfixes or say upgrade to new acpica that we would need to > > > regenerate the bits binaries. > > > > Theoretically, that's correct. But if we did not have bugs we would > > not need tests. > > Hmm, you might have a point. Curious, do we keep versioned binaries of > edk for example?
We keep them in git, don't we? Under pc-bios. > If so, why we can't do the same for bits? What can I say - let's get this upstream in some form and then worry about improving the infrastructure. -- MST
