On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 at 01:45, Icenowy Zheng <u...@icenowy.me> wrote: > > 在 2022-10-29星期六的 06:28 +1100，Richard Henderson写道： > > Oh my. I'm surprised any test cases at all worked. > > Queued to tcg-next, with the declaration of j moved to the loop > > itself: > > > > for (int j = 0; j < nargs; ++j) > > Ah I think this is a C99 feature. Is our C standard baseline high > enough to use it?
Mmm, my instinctive reaction was that our style probably doesn't permit that. But if you do git grep 'for (int' we already use it quite a bit... -- PMM
