Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> wrote: > Now with rs->pss we can already cache channels in pss->pss_channels. That > pss_channel contains more infromation than rs->f because it's per-channel. > So rs->f could be replaced by rss->pss[RAM_CHANNEL_PRECOPY].pss_channel, > while rs->f itself is a bit vague now. > > Note that vanilla postcopy still send pages via pss[RAM_CHANNEL_PRECOPY], > that's slightly confusing but it reflects the reality. > > Then, after the replacement we can safely drop rs->f. > > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
