On 01/09/2012 05:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-01-09 16:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 01/06/2012 04:40 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >>> Avi, if you think that early_savevm is a decent solution, we'll start > >>> working on it. > >> > >> I don't like early_savevm because it complicates life for devices, for > >> what is a localized problem. But if everything else is even more > >> complicated maybe we should do it. > > > > I have been thinking more about this issue but unfortunately I cannot > > come up with anything better than early_savevm. > > And I do not yet see the impact of the early_savevm concept on devices. > Its point is to have some vmstate that is unrelated, actually predates > any device creation (during restore).
Okay then, at least we tried. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
