On 12/16/22 09:29, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
All the objections you're raising are related to the current specifics of the implementation of the mssim remote server. While valid, this is of no concern to QEMU when deciding whether to require a migration blocker on the client side. This is 3rd party remote service that should be considered a black box from QEMU's POV. It is possible to write a remote server that supports the mssim network protocol, and has the ability to serialize its state. Whether such an impl exists today or not is separate.
Then let's document the scenarios so someone can repeat them, I think this is just fair. James said he tested state migration scenarios and it works, so let's enable others to do it as well. I am open to someone maintaining just this driver and the dynamics that may develop around it. Regards, Stefan
With regards, Daniel
