On 17/12/22 01:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 12/16/22 14:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Only the declarations using the target_ulong type are
target specific.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
---
  include/sysemu/kvm.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index c8281c07a7..a53d6dab49 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -242,9 +242,6 @@ bool kvm_arm_supports_user_irq(void);
  int kvm_on_sigbus_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, int code, void *addr);
  int kvm_on_sigbus(int code, void *addr);
-#ifdef NEED_CPU_H
-#include "cpu.h"
-
  void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void);
  /**
@@ -410,6 +407,9 @@ void kvm_get_apic_state(DeviceState *d, struct kvm_lapic_state *kapic);
  struct kvm_guest_debug;
  struct kvm_debug_exit_arch;
+#ifdef NEED_CPU_H
+#include "cpu.h"
+
  struct kvm_sw_breakpoint {
      target_ulong pc;
      target_ulong saved_insn;
@@ -436,6 +436,15 @@ void kvm_arch_update_guest_debug(CPUState *cpu, struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg);
  bool kvm_arch_stop_on_emulation_error(CPUState *cpu);
+uint32_t kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(KVMState *env, uint32_t function,
+                                      uint32_t index, int reg);
+uint64_t kvm_arch_get_supported_msr_feature(KVMState *s, uint32_t index);
+
+int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram_addr,
+                                       hwaddr *phys_addr);

Why did these need to move?

kvm_arch_get_XXX() don't need to move, but they are only called from
target-specific code, so there is no point in declaring them for
target-agnostic part; besides that helps catching unnecessary
target-specific stuff built within target-agnostic code.


Normally kvm_enabled() shouldn't be use by user-mode code; we could
poison it. In practice we have few common files calling it, so this
header is included, declaring kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host()
which uses hwaddr. I'm trying to not define hwaddr in user-mode.

I thought this patch would be trivial :/ I'll split it with tiny /
better justified ones.

Thanks,

Phil.

Reply via email to