On 1/5/23 08:43, Alex Bennée wrote:
Now we have removed any target specific bits from the core gdbstub
code we only need to build it twice. We have to jump a few meson hoops
to manually define the CONFIG_USER_ONLY symbol but it seems to work.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
---
gdbstub/gdbstub.c | 3 +--
gdbstub/user-target.c | 2 +-
gdbstub/meson.build | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdbstub/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub/gdbstub.c
index 57bbda3505..0dbb9f5338 100644
--- a/gdbstub/gdbstub.c
+++ b/gdbstub/gdbstub.c
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
#include "sysemu/runstate.h"
-#include "exec/exec-all.h"
#include "exec/tb-flush.h"
#include "exec/hwaddr.h"
#include "sysemu/replay.h"
@@ -1611,7 +1610,7 @@ static const GdbCmdParseEntry gdb_gen_query_table[] = {
.cmd_startswith = 1,
.schema = "s:l,l0"
},
-#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) && defined(CONFIG_LINUX_USER)
+#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) && defined(CONFIG_LINUX)
{
.handler = gdb_handle_query_xfer_auxv,
.cmd = "Xfer:auxv:read::",
diff --git a/gdbstub/user-target.c b/gdbstub/user-target.c
index 83e04e1c23..46f5729999 100644
--- a/gdbstub/user-target.c
+++ b/gdbstub/user-target.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static inline int target_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *cpu,
target_ulong addr,
}
-#if defined(CONFIG_LINUX_USER)
+#if defined(CONFIG_LINUX)
void gdb_handle_query_xfer_auxv(GArray *params, void *user_ctx)
{
TaskState *ts;
diff --git a/gdbstub/meson.build b/gdbstub/meson.build
index 56c40c25ef..193c20203d 100644
--- a/gdbstub/meson.build
+++ b/gdbstub/meson.build
@@ -4,13 +4,37 @@
# types such as hwaddr.
#
-specific_ss.add(files('gdbstub.c'))
+# We need to build the core gdb code via a library to be able to tweak
+# cflags so:
-# These have to built to the target ABI
-specific_ss.add(files('syscalls.c'))
+gdb_user_ss = ss.source_set()
+gdb_softmmu_ss = ss.source_set()
-softmmu_ss.add(files('softmmu.c'))
+# We build two versions of gdbstub, one for each mode
+gdb_user_ss.add(files('gdbstub.c'))
+gdb_softmmu_ss.add(files('gdbstub.c'))
+
+gdb_user_ss = gdb_user_ss.apply(config_host, strict: false)
+gdb_softmmu_ss = gdb_softmmu_ss.apply(config_host, strict: false)
+
+libgdb_user = static_library('gdb_user', gdb_user_ss.sources(),
+ name_suffix: 'fa',
+ c_args: '-DCONFIG_USER_ONLY')
+
+libgdb_softmmu = static_library('gdb_softmmu', gdb_softmmu_ss.sources(),
+ name_suffix: 'fa')
+
+gdb_user = declare_dependency(link_whole: libgdb_user)
+user_ss.add(gdb_user)
+gdb_softmmu = declare_dependency(link_whole: libgdb_softmmu)
+softmmu_ss.add(gdb_softmmu)
+
+# The rest of the mode specific code can be added directly
user_ss.add(files('user.c'))
+softmmu_ss.add(files('softmmu.c'))
+
+# These have to built to the target ABI
+specific_ss.add(files('syscalls.c'))
It seems weird to put one file into a library and other files directly into the
user/softmmu source sets. Why not just put everything except user-target.c into the
corresponding libraries?
# and BSD?
specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_LINUX_USER', if_true: files('user-target.c'))
Definitely "and BSD". I can't see how this will link at all, missing e.g.
gdb_handle_query_offsets.
r~