On 1/11/23 01:59, Alex Bennée wrote:
@@ -3277,13 +3278,26 @@ static void temp_allocate_frame(TCGContext *s, TCGTemp *ts) tcg_raise_tb_overflow(s); } s->current_frame_offset = off + size; - - ts->mem_offset = off; #if defined(__sparc__) - ts->mem_offset += TCG_TARGET_STACK_BIAS; + off += TCG_TARGET_STACK_BIAS; #endif - ts->mem_base = s->frame_temp; - ts->mem_allocated = 1; + + /* If the object was subdivided, assign memory to all the parts. */ + if (ts->base_type != ts->type) { + int part_size = tcg_type_size(ts->type); + int part_count = size / part_size; + + ts -= ts->temp_subindex;Whats going on here? Are we jumping to a previous temp? What guarentees there is something at ts - ts->temp_subindex?
Yes. Guaranteed by base_type != type. See tcg_temp_new_internal -- it's the raison d'être of temp_subindex.
r~
