On 1/17/23 08:14, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes:Install empty versions for !TCG_TARGET_HAS_direct_jump hosts. Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> --- tcg/arm/tcg-target.c.inc | 6 ++++++ tcg/mips/tcg-target.c.inc | 6 ++++++ tcg/riscv/tcg-target.c.inc | 6 ++++++ tcg/tci/tcg-target.c.inc | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/tcg/arm/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/arm/tcg-target.c.inc index b8f3b0c634..b21dd561fa 100644 --- a/tcg/arm/tcg-target.c.inc +++ b/tcg/arm/tcg-target.c.inc @@ -1964,6 +1964,12 @@ static void tcg_out_goto_tb(TCGContext *s, int which) set_jmp_reset_offset(s, which); }+void tb_target_set_jmp_target(const TranslationBlock *tb, int n,+ uintptr_t jmp_rx, uintptr_t jmp_rw) +{ + /* Always indirect, nothing to do */Should we assert and then remove when we fill in because some targets never gain this ability.
The very next patch calls this function unconditionally. So, no. r~
