On 16 January 2012 12:13, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 16.01.2012 12:38, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 16 January 2012 00:46, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOLARIS) && CONFIG_SOLARIS_VERSION < 10 >>> +/* uint_fast8_t and uint_fast16_t not in <sys/int_types.h> */ >>> +typedef unsigned char uint_fast8_t; >>> +typedef unsigned int uint_fast16_t; >>> +#endif >> >> If you make the comment say >> /* uint_fast*_t and int_fast*_t not in <sys/int_types.h> */ >> >> then it won't become out of date when your later patches add >> the other types to this section. > > I have no clue if that is the case, I just moved it and fixed the > comment style. But sure, I can change the comment itself as well.
Well, your later patches add more typedefs here, right? So we need to know: either old Solaris doesn't have any of these types and we must typedef them all (and the comment should match that), or it is only missing the two currently noted here, in which case we don't need to and should not add further typedefs. What we don't want is to have a comment and code which disagree... -- PMM
