On 11/01/2023 00:36, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 04/01/2023 21:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
The mac99 machine emulates different machines depending on machine
properties or even if it is run as qemu-system-ppc64 or
qemu-system-ppc. This is very confusing for users and many hours were
lost trying to explain it or finding out why commands users came up
with are not working as expected. (E.g. Windows users might think
qemu-system-ppc64 is just the 64 bit version of qemu-system-ppc and
then fail to boot a 32 bit OS with -M mac99 trying to follow an
example that had qemu-system-ppc.) To avoid such confusion, add
explicit machine types for the different configs which will work the
same with both qemu-system-ppc and qemu-system-ppc64 and also make the
command line clearer for new users.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu>
Some thoughts on this: the first is that not everyone agrees that for qemu-system-X
that X represents the target. There were previous discussion where some KVM people
assumed X represented the host, i.e. ppc64 was the binary that ran all PPC guests
but with hardware acceleration for ppc64 guests on ppc64 hosts. This was a while
ago, so it may be worth starting a thread on qemu-devel to see what the current
consensus is.
I don't see how this is relevant to this series, Also likely not the case any more as
qemu-system-ppc and qemu-system-ppc64 share most of the code since a while with ppc64
including the config of ppc and adding more machines.
Well the patch defines the powermac 7.3 machine just for TARGET_PPC64, no? So you're
making the assumption qemu-system-ppc64 represents a 64-bit target rather than a
64-bit host.
Secondly it's not clear to me why you've chosen names like "powermac_3_1" instead
of "g4agp"? Does powermac_3_1 uniquely identify the G4 AGP Sawtooth model? For QEMU
it is always best to emulate real machines, and whilst I understand you want to
separate out the two versions of the mac99 machine, having "powermac_X_Y" seems
less clear to me.
These machine model identifiers are used by Apple to uniquely identify (all of) their
machines since new-world Macs (even modern iPads and Macs have them) so for Mac
people this should be clearer than the informal names that could get a bit long and
confusing as there may be slight differences within a family. In any case,
qemu-system-ppc -M mac99 is not corresponding to any real Mac so I'd like the options
which do emulate real Macs to be called in a name that show which Mac is that. For
the PPC Macs there's some info here for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Mac_G4
And everymac.com also has info on all Macs. There were actually more than one G4
PowerMac with AGP but the other one was informally called gigabit ethernet. So the
model ID is a shorter and better way to clearly identify which hardware is it (and
it's also referenced in the device-tree of these Macs).
Are you planning to work on different types of G4 Mac where this could be confusing?
Even to me "PowerMac 3.1" doesn't really tell me what model of Mac is being emulated,
whereas "g4agp" (much in the same way as g3beige) is much more friendlier to people
interested in using QEMU for Mac emulation.
Finally can you post links to the device trees that you are using for each of the
new machine types so that we have a clear reference point for future changes to the
QEMU Mac machines? Even better include the links in the comments for each machine
so that the information is easily visible for developers.
I still have those I've posted over the past 8 years when I made changes to OpenBIOS
to make the device-tree closer to real machine. I've downloaded it back then, don't
know where to find it now but searching for e.g. "PowerMac3,1" "device-tree" should
get some results.
Nothing shows up for me, I'm afraid (remember that Google searches are unique to each
user). If you want argue for changing the QEMU machines, then we should agree on the
reference device model for future changes.
ATB,
Mark.
