On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 7:38 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarb...@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In this version I changed the patch order to avoid having a patch that
> would trigger the 32 bit regression Alistair observed. Patch 3 is now
> the first patch.
>
> I've also addressed the comments from Bin and Phil.
>
> Patches based on riscv-to-apply.next.
>
> Changes from v8:
> - patch 1 (former 3):
>   - comment changes
>   - now open code '32' instead of using a macro
> - v8 link: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-01/msg03254.html
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (3):
>   hw/riscv: clear kernel_entry higher bits from load_elf_ram_sym()
>   hw/riscv/boot.c: consolidate all kernel init in riscv_load_kernel()
>   hw/riscv/boot.c: make riscv_load_initrd() static

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

Alistair

>
>  hw/riscv/boot.c            | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  hw/riscv/microchip_pfsoc.c | 12 +----
>  hw/riscv/opentitan.c       |  4 +-
>  hw/riscv/sifive_e.c        |  4 +-
>  hw/riscv/sifive_u.c        | 12 +----
>  hw/riscv/spike.c           | 14 ++----
>  hw/riscv/virt.c            | 12 +----
>  include/hw/riscv/boot.h    |  3 +-
>  8 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.39.0
>
>

Reply via email to