On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 18:07:19 +0100
Bernhard Beschow <shen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The first thing ich9_pm_iospace_update() does is to set pm->pm_io_base to
> the pm_io_base parameter.
try to explain why 'pm->pm_io_base = 0' was there , what's changed 
and then why it's no longer needed.

> The pm_io_base parameter's value is the old
> one of pm->pm_io_base.
I can't parse this sentence.


fixes: cacaab8bdd7460

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shen...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  hw/acpi/ich9.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/ich9.c b/hw/acpi/ich9.c
> index 2050af67b9..0313e71e74 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/ich9.c
> @@ -136,9 +136,7 @@ void ich9_pm_iospace_update(ICH9LPCPMRegs *pm, uint32_t 
> pm_io_base)
>  static int ich9_pm_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
>  {
>      ICH9LPCPMRegs *pm = opaque;
> -    uint32_t pm_io_base = pm->pm_io_base;
> -    pm->pm_io_base = 0;
> -    ich9_pm_iospace_update(pm, pm_io_base);
> +    ich9_pm_iospace_update(pm, pm->pm_io_base);
>      return 0;
>  }
>  


Reply via email to