From: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> If something goes wrong during uffd_change_protection(), we would miss to unregister uffd-wp and not release our reference. Fix it by performing the uffd_change_protection(true) last.
Note that a uffd_change_protection(false) on the recovery path without a prior uffd_change_protection(false) is fine. Fixes: 278e2f551a09 ("migration: support UFFD write fault processing in ram_save_iterate()") Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> --- migration/ram.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c index ba228eead4..73e5ca93e5 100644 --- a/migration/ram.c +++ b/migration/ram.c @@ -1896,13 +1896,14 @@ int ram_write_tracking_start(void) block->max_length, UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP, NULL)) { goto fail; } + block->flags |= RAM_UF_WRITEPROTECT; + memory_region_ref(block->mr); + /* Apply UFFD write protection to the block memory range */ if (uffd_change_protection(rs->uffdio_fd, block->host, block->max_length, true, false)) { goto fail; } - block->flags |= RAM_UF_WRITEPROTECT; - memory_region_ref(block->mr); trace_ram_write_tracking_ramblock_start(block->idstr, block->page_size, block->host, block->max_length); -- 2.39.1