On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:40:25 +0100, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 19.01.2012 18:27, schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V: > > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++-- > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index de2a9163..f9f131c 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -399,9 +399,11 @@ S: Supported > > F: hw/virtio* > > > > virtio-9p > > -M: Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) <jv...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > +M: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > S: Supported > > -F: hw/virtio-9p* > > +F: hw/9pfs/ fsdev/ > > +T: https://github.com/kvaneesh/QEMU > > Shouldn't this be T: git://github.com/kvaneesh/QEMU.git your-9p-branch? > You can use the above Web URL with W: if you wish. > > Maybe update the title to 9pfs, too? (Not that I understand much of it, > just spotting the apparent inconsistency.) > > Andreas
All the branches in that repo are used for 9p development. I use for-upstream to push changes to anthony. So was not sure whether I should specify for-upstream there. -aneesh
