On 13/02/2023 16:00, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
ENABLED -> PWRONLY transition is not allowed and we handle it by shpc_invalid_command(). But PWRONLY -> ENABLED transition is silently ignored, which seems wrong. Let's handle it as correct.Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@yandex-team.ru> --- hw/pci/shpc.c | 24 +++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/pci/shpc.c b/hw/pci/shpc.c index 5d71569b13..25e4172382 100644 --- a/hw/pci/shpc.c +++ b/hw/pci/shpc.c @@ -273,28 +273,22 @@ static void shpc_slot_command(SHPCDevice *shpc, uint8_t target, return; }- switch (power) {- case SHPC_LED_NO: - break; - default: + if (power != SHPC_LED_NO) { /* TODO: send event to monitor */ shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, power, SHPC_SLOT_PWR_LED_MASK); } - switch (attn) { - case SHPC_LED_NO: - break; - default: + if (attn != SHPC_LED_NO) { /* TODO: send event to monitor */ shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, attn, SHPC_SLOT_ATTN_LED_MASK); } - - if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED && state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) || - (current_state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED && state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED)) { - shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK); - } else if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED || - current_state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) && - state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED) { + if (state != SHPC_STATE_NO) { shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK); + } + + if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED || + current_state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) && + state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED) + { power = shpc_get_status(shpc, slot, SHPC_SLOT_PWR_LED_MASK); /* TODO: track what monitor requested. */ /* Look at LED to figure out whether it's ok to remove the device. */
Reviewed-by: Anton Kuchin <antonkuc...@yandex-team.ru>
