Hi Michael,

Thanks for reviewing this on a weekend!

On 26/2/23 19:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 01:58:10AM +0000, Damien Zammit wrote:
>>       case 0:
>> -        out = (d >= s->count);
>> -        break;
>
>
> I think you need something like
>       /* FALLTHRU */
> here otherwise some gcc versions will warn.
>
>>       case 1:
>> -        out = (d < s->count);
>> +        out = (d >= s->count);

It seems that there are quite a number of these consecutive fallthrough cases
without /* FALLTHRU */ in i8254_common.c

Can these be fixed in a separate patch?

Damien


Reply via email to