On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:00 PM BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Bernhard Beschow wrote: > > On behalve of Zoltan BALATON: > > You don't have to do that and in fact please don't. I'll handle this > series just reply to the one patch that needs update with only the changes > that were asked by review. > > Regards, > BALATON Zoltan > Google seems to agree with me by not letting me send your patches :/ Sent [PATCH v4 0/7] Pegasos2 fixes and audio output support Sent [PATCH v4 1/7] hw/display/sm501: Implement more 2D raster operations Sent [PATCH v4 2/7] hw/display/sm501: Add fallbacks to pixman routines Sent [PATCH v4 3/7] hw/display/sm501: Add debug property to control pixman usage 4.3.0 Mail server temporarily rejected message. bk4-20020a170906b0c400b008d7a8083dffsm3186414ejb.222 - gsmtp As said before I don't want to iterate on the changes of this series. I can't test them and from my POV they seem unnecessary to me since all the test cases I can perform still work without the IRQ changes. Looking at the schematics I get the impression that the PCI IRQs actually work the other way around: Instead of the INTx lines of the 2nd PCI bus triggering both the north and the south bridge IRQ controllers, the two PCI buses of the north bridge both trigger the VT82xx PCI IRQ router. I'm not a hardware engineer so I could be totally off here. That's why I rather leave my hands off of this stuff. Best regards, Bernhard
