On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 8:05 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:56:27AM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:50 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 06:20:58PM +0200, Andrew Melnychenko wrote:
> > > > Added a function to check the stamp in the helper.
> > > > eBPF helper should have a special symbol that generates during the
> build.
> > > > QEMU checks the helper and determines that it fits, so the helper
> > > > will produce proper output.
> > >
> > > I think this is quite limiting for in place upgrades.
> > >
> > > Consider this scenario
> > >
> > > * Host has QEMU 8.1.0 installed
> > > * VM is running QEMU 8.1.0
> > > * QEMU 8.1.1 is released with a bug fix in the EBF program
> > > * Host is upgraded to QEMU 8.1.1
> > > * User attempts to hotplug a NIC to the running VM
> > >
> > > IIUC this last step is going to fail because we'll be loading
> > > the EBF program from 8.1.1 and so its hash is different from
> > > that expected by the QEMU 8.1.0 that the pre-existing VM is
> > > running.
> > >
> > > Indeed we did not take in account the in-place upgrade.
> >
> >
> >
> > > If some changes to the EBF program are not going to be back
> > > compatible from the POV of the QEMU process, should we instead
> > > be versioning the EBF program. eg so new QEMU will ship both
> > > the old and new versions of the EBF program.
> >
> > This does not seem to be an elegant option: QEMU theoretically can
> include
> > different eBPF programs but it hardly can interface with each one of
> them.
> > The code of QEMU (access to eBPF maps etc) includes header files which
> eBPF
> > of the day is being built with them.
> >
> > I see 2 options to address this issue (of course there are more)
> > 1. Build and install qemu-rss-helper-<hash> executable. Libvirt will
> always
> > have a correct name, so for the running instance it will use
> > qemu-rss-helper-<old-hash>, for the new instance it will use
> > qemu-rss-helper-<new-hash>
>
> We'll get an ever growing number of program variants we need to
> build & distribute with each new QEMU release.
>
New release of the qemu-rss-helper-<new-hash> will be created in fact only
when the eBPF binary is updated.
This does not happen on each release. But yes, this looks like versioning
of all the shared libraries.
>
> > 2. Build the helper executable and link it inside qemu as a blob. Libvirt
> > will always retrieve the executable to the temporary file name and use
> it.
> > So the retrieved helper will always be compatible with QEMU. I'm not sure
> > what is the most portable way to do that.
>
> QEMU is considered an untrusted process, so there's no way we're going
> to ask it to give us an ELF binary and then execute that in privileged
> context.
>
> > Does one of these seem suitable?
>
> Neither feels very appealing to me.
>
> I've been trying to understand the eBPF code we're dealing with in a
> little more detail.
>
> IIUC, QEMU, or rather the virtio-net driver needs to receive one FD
> for the BPF program, and one or more FDs for the BPF maps that the
> program uses. Currently it uses 3 maps, so needs 3 map FDs on top of
> the program FD.
>
> The helper program that is proposed here calls ebpf_rss_load() to
> load the program and get back a struct which gives access to the
> 4 FDs, which are then sent to the mgmt app, which forwards them
> onto QEMU.
>
> The ebpf_rss_load() method is making use of various structs that
> are specific to the RSS program implementation, but does not seems
> to do anything especially interesting. It calls into rss_bpf__open()
> which eventually gets around to calling rss_bpf__create_skeleton
> which is where the interesting stuff happens.
>
> This rss_bpf__create_skeleton() method is implemented in terms of
> totally generic libbpf APIs, and has the actual blob that is the
> BPF program.
>
> Looking at what this does, I feel it should be trivial for a mgmt
> app to implement equivalent logic to rss_bpf__create_skeleton in a
> generic manner, if we could just expose the program blob and the
> map names to the mgmt app. eg a simple json file
>
> {
> "maps": [
> "tap_rss_map_configurations",
> "tap_rss_map_indirection_table",
> "tap_rss_map_toeplitz_key",
> ],
> "program": "....the big blob encoded in base64..."
> }
>
> if we installed that file are /usr/share/qemu/bpf/net-rss.json
> then when a QEMU process is started, the mgmt app capture the
> data in this JSON file. It now has enough info to create the
> EBPF programs needed and pass the FDs over to QEMU. This would
> be robust against QEMU software upgrades, and not tied to the
> specific EBPF program imlp. We can add or remove maps / change
> their names etc any time, as the details in the JSON descriptor
> can be updated. This avoids need for any special helper program
> to be provided by QEMU with the problems that is throwing up
> for us.
>
If I understand correctly, the libvirt will have the same problem in the
in-place update scenario with the JSON file
Let's say that there is no virtio-net device at the initial start and the
libvirt does not need to load the JSON file.
On the later hot plug of virtio-net it will go to the JSON file after the
update, correct?
>
> What am I missing ? This seems pretty straightforward to
> achieve from what I see.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com -o-
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org -o-
> https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org -o-
> https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
>
>
