On 26.01.2012 13:08, Kevin Wolf wrote: [] >> -readconfig fd:9 > Magic prefixes like this have one big problem: What if someone has a > config file called "fd:9"? We have the very same problem with protocols
-readconfig ./fd:9 does the trick. > in the block layer and while in the general case it's a convenient > syntax, we've come to hate it in cases where it misinterprets things. /mjt
