On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 06:00:18PM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote: > There is no reason to block it as it has nothing to do with the vrings. > All the support of the feature comes via config space. > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <epere...@redhat.com> > Suggested-by: Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.ka...@solid-run.com>
do we need to version this with machine type btw? > --- > net/vhost-vdpa.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c > index de5ed8ff22..8b25559320 100644 > --- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c > +++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c > @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ static const uint64_t vdpa_svq_device_features = > BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | > BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR) | > BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_RSC_EXT) | > - BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY); > + BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY) | > + BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX); > > #define VHOST_VDPA_NET_CVQ_ASID 1 > > -- > 2.31.1
