On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 15:16, Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> wrote:
>
> Le 16/03/2023 à 14:42, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 13:40, Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu 
> > <mailto:laur...@vivier.eu>> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Le 14/03/2023 à 12:44, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> >  > > Currently, the kerneldoc Sphinx plugin doesn't honour the
> >  > > --enable-werror configure option, so its warnings are never fatal.
> >  > > This is because although we do pass sphinx-build the -W switch, the
> >  > > warnings from kerneldoc are produced by the scripts/kernel-doc script
> >  > > directly and don't go through Sphinx's "emit a warning" function.
> >  > >
> >  > > When --enable-werror is in effect, pass sphinx-build an extra
> >  > > argument -Dkerneldoc_werror=1.  The kerneldoc plugin can then use
> >  > > this to determine whether it should be passing the kernel-doc script
> >  > > -Werror.
> >  > >
> >  > > We do this because there is no documented mechanism for
> >  > > a Sphinx plugin to determine whether sphinx-build was
> >  > > passed -W or not; if one is provided then we can switch to
> >  > > that at a later date:
> >  > > https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/11239
> > <https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/11239>
> >  > >
> >  > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org 
> > <mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org>>
> >  > > ---
> >  > > NB: we need to land the fix for the current outstanding
> >  > > warning before this one can go in...
> >  > > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230310103123.2118519-11-alex.ben...@linaro.org/
> > <https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230310103123.2118519-11-alex.ben...@linaro.org/>
> >  > > ---
> >  > >   docs/meson.build         | 2 +-
> >  > >   docs/sphinx/kerneldoc.py | 5 +++++
> >  > >   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >  > I've applied it to my trivial-patches branch,
> >  > but if you want to apply it via some doc or misc branches, let me know.
> >
> > Trivial is fine, but make sure you've put in the fix for
> > the outstanding warning first :-)
>
> I didn't take this one but:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg949558.html

Yeah, that one has the same effect.

-- PMM

Reply via email to