On 2023-03-22 9:40 a.m., Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/03/2023 14.38, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 22/3/23 13:36, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
As a VM used only for automated testing there is no need to
install the X11 stack.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
---
tests/vm/openbsd | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/vm/openbsd b/tests/vm/openbsd
index eaeb201e91..6af7afac0d 100755
--- a/tests/vm/openbsd
+++ b/tests/vm/openbsd
@@ -106,8 +106,7 @@ class OpenBSDVM(basevm.BaseVM):
self.console_wait("Password for root account")
self.console_send("%s\n" % self._config["root_pass"])
self.console_wait_send("Start sshd(8)", "yes\n")
- self.console_wait_send("X Window System", "\n")
- self.console_wait_send("xenodm", "\n")
+ self.console_wait_send("X Window System", "no\n")
Wasn't this useful to link a X11-ready binary, even if only testing
with -display=none?
tests/vm/openbsd later installs sdl2 and gtk+3, so I assume that will
pull in the required libraries if necessary, without all the other
non-necessary stuff.
No, it will not. If you want sdl2 / gtk+3 you have to have X enabled.
