Nothing calls these routines now. In the bsd-user fork, though, they've
moved to netbsd/os-syscall.c, but those aren't ready for upstreaming.

Signed-off-by: Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com>
---
 bsd-user/qemu.h   |  5 -----
 bsd-user/strace.c | 17 -----------------
 2 files changed, 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bsd-user/qemu.h b/bsd-user/qemu.h
index c5240938da7..cee02d2a0ea 100644
--- a/bsd-user/qemu.h
+++ b/bsd-user/qemu.h
@@ -196,11 +196,6 @@ struct syscallname {
     void (*result)(const struct syscallname *, abi_long);
 };
 
-void
-print_netbsd_syscall(int num,
-                     abi_long arg1, abi_long arg2, abi_long arg3,
-                     abi_long arg4, abi_long arg5, abi_long arg6);
-void print_netbsd_syscall_ret(int num, abi_long ret);
 void
 print_openbsd_syscall(int num,
                       abi_long arg1, abi_long arg2, abi_long arg3,
diff --git a/bsd-user/strace.c b/bsd-user/strace.c
index 7d0117fd3cf..8e76caa3c3f 100644
--- a/bsd-user/strace.c
+++ b/bsd-user/strace.c
@@ -146,9 +146,6 @@ void print_syscall_ret_addr(const struct syscallname *name, 
abi_long ret)
  * An array of all of the syscalls we know about
  */
 
-static const struct syscallname netbsd_scnames[] = {
-#include "netbsd/strace.list"
-};
 static const struct syscallname openbsd_scnames[] = {
 #include "openbsd/strace.list"
 };
@@ -209,20 +206,6 @@ void print_syscall_ret(int num, abi_long ret, const struct 
syscallname *scnames,
 /*
  * The public interface to this module.
  */
-void print_netbsd_syscall(int num, abi_long arg1, abi_long arg2, abi_long arg3,
-        abi_long arg4, abi_long arg5, abi_long arg6)
-{
-
-    print_syscall(num, netbsd_scnames, ARRAY_SIZE(netbsd_scnames),
-                  arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5, arg6);
-}
-
-void print_netbsd_syscall_ret(int num, abi_long ret)
-{
-
-    print_syscall_ret(num, ret, netbsd_scnames, ARRAY_SIZE(netbsd_scnames));
-}
-
 void print_openbsd_syscall(int num, abi_long arg1, abi_long arg2, abi_long 
arg3,
         abi_long arg4, abi_long arg5, abi_long arg6)
 {
-- 
2.40.0


Reply via email to