On 2023/4/7 23:32, Irina Ryapolova wrote:
Before changing the flow check for sv39/48/57.

According to specification (for Supervisor mode):
Sv39 implementations support a 39-bit virtual address space, divided into 4 KiB 
pages.
Instruction fetch addresses and load and store effective addresses, which are 
64 bits,
must have bits 63–39 all equal to bit 38, or else a page-fault exception will 
occur.
Likewise for Sv48 and Sv57.

So the high bits are equal to bit 38 for sv39.

According to specification (for Hypervisor mode):
For Sv39x4, address bits of the guest physical address 63:41 must all be zeros, 
or else a
guest-page-fault exception occurs.

Likewise for Sv48x4 and Sv57x4.
For Sv48x4 address bits 63:50 must all be zeros, or else a guest-page-fault 
exception occurs.
For Sv57x4 address bits 63:59 must all be zeros, or else a guest-page-fault 
exception occurs.

For example we are trying to access address 0xffff_ffff_ff01_0000 with only 
G-translation enabled.
So expected behavior is to generate exception. But qemu doesn't generate such 
exception.

For the old check, we get
va_bits == 41, mask == (1 << 24) - 1, masked_msbs == (0xffff_ffff_ff01_0000 >> 40) 
& mask == mask.
Accordingly, the condition masked_msbs != 0 && masked_msbs != mask is not 
fulfilled
and the check passes.

Signed-off-by: Irina Ryapolova <irina.ryapol...@syntacore.com>
---
Changes for v2:
   -Add more detailed commit message
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn>

I remember I have sent Reviewed-by for last version of this patch.  And it seems no change in following code.

Weiwei Li

---
  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index f88c503cf4..27289f2305 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -863,17 +863,24 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, 
hwaddr *physical,
CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
      int va_bits = PGSHIFT + levels * ptidxbits + widened;
-    target_ulong mask, masked_msbs;
- if (TARGET_LONG_BITS > (va_bits - 1)) {
-        mask = (1L << (TARGET_LONG_BITS - (va_bits - 1))) - 1;
-    } else {
-        mask = 0;
-    }
-    masked_msbs = (addr >> (va_bits - 1)) & mask;
+    if (first_stage == true) {
+        target_ulong mask, masked_msbs;
+
+        if (TARGET_LONG_BITS > (va_bits - 1)) {
+            mask = (1L << (TARGET_LONG_BITS - (va_bits - 1))) - 1;
+        } else {
+            mask = 0;
+        }
+        masked_msbs = (addr >> (va_bits - 1)) & mask;
- if (masked_msbs != 0 && masked_msbs != mask) {
-        return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
+        if (masked_msbs != 0 && masked_msbs != mask) {
+            return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
+        }
+    } else {
+        if (vm != VM_1_10_SV32 && addr >> va_bits != 0) {
+            return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
+        }
      }
int ptshift = (levels - 1) * ptidxbits;


Reply via email to