On 4/20/23 03:05, Ani Sinha wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:22 PM Eric DeVolder <eric.devol...@oracle.com> wrote:

Currently i386 QEMU generates MADT revision 3, and reports
MADT revision 1. ACPI 6.3 introduces MADT revision 5.

For MADT revision 4, that introduces ARM GIC structures, which do
not apply to i386.

For MADT revision 5, the Local APIC flags introduces the Online
Capable bitfield.

Making MADT generate and report revision 5 will solve problems with
CPU hotplug (the Online Capable flag indicates hotpluggable CPUs).

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devol...@oracle.com/T/#t
Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devol...@oracle.com>
---
  hw/i386/acpi-common.c | 13 ++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-common.c b/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
index 52e5c1439a..286c1c5c32 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
@@ -38,8 +38,15 @@ void pc_madt_cpu_entry(int uid, const CPUArchIdList 
*apic_ids,
  {
      uint32_t apic_id = apic_ids->cpus[uid].arch_id;
      /* Flags – Local APIC Flags */
-    uint32_t flags = apic_ids->cpus[uid].cpu != NULL || force_enabled ?
-                     1 /* Enabled */ : 0;
+    bool enabled = apic_ids->cpus[uid].cpu != NULL || force_enabled ?
+                     true : false;

how about "processor_enabled" instead of just "enabled" as the variable name.

+    /*
+     * ACPI 6.3 5.2.12.2 Local APIC Flags: OnlineCapable must be 0
+     * if Enabled is set.
+     */
+    bool onlinecapable = enabled ? false : true;

ugh, how about uint32 onlinecapable = enabled? 0x0 : 0x2 ?

+    uint32_t flags = onlinecapable ? 0x2 : 0x0 | /* Online Capable */
+                     enabled ? 0x1 : 0x0; /* Enabled */

then here, flags = onlinecapable | processor_enabled? 0x1 : 0x0;


Colleague Miguel Luis pointed out that this is simpler and equivalent:

uint32_t flags = apic_ids->cpus[uid].cpu != NULL || force_enabled ? 1 /* Enabled */ : 2 /* Online Capable */;

Is that acceptable?
eric


      /* ACPI spec says that LAPIC entry for non present
       * CPU may be omitted from MADT or it must be marked
@@ -102,7 +109,7 @@ void acpi_build_madt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(x86ms);
      const CPUArchIdList *apic_ids = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(MACHINE(x86ms));
      AcpiDeviceIfClass *adevc = ACPI_DEVICE_IF_GET_CLASS(adev);
-    AcpiTable table = { .sig = "APIC", .rev = 1, .oem_id = oem_id,
+    AcpiTable table = { .sig = "APIC", .rev = 5, .oem_id = oem_id,
                          .oem_table_id = oem_table_id };

      acpi_table_begin(&table, table_data);
--
2.31.1


Reply via email to