On 4/13/23 21:01, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
Add test for vextractbm, vextractwm, vextractdm and vextractqm
instructions. Test works for both qemu-ppc64 and qemu-ppc64le.

Based on the test case written by John Platts posted at [1]

References:
[1]: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1536

Gitlab issues should be referenced as :

Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1536

However, this patch adds a test, not a fix. So it is the previous patch
which should be annotated as resolving the issue.

Also, I think the code should be using  HOST_BIG_ENDIAN instead of
__ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__

Thanks,

C.


Signed-off-by: John Platts <john_pla...@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sb...@linux.ibm.com>
---
  tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target |    6 ++++-
  tests/tcg/ppc64/vector.c        |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  create mode 100644 tests/tcg/ppc64/vector.c

diff --git a/tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target
index f081f1c683..4fd543ce28 100644
--- a/tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target
+++ b/tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ PPC64_TESTS += mtfsf
  PPC64_TESTS += mffsce
ifneq ($(CROSS_CC_HAS_POWER10),)
-PPC64_TESTS += byte_reverse sha512-vector
+PPC64_TESTS += byte_reverse sha512-vector vector
  endif
  byte_reverse: CFLAGS += -mcpu=power10
  run-byte_reverse: QEMU_OPTS+=-cpu POWER10
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ sha512-vector: sha512.c
  run-sha512-vector: QEMU_OPTS+=-cpu POWER10
  run-plugin-sha512-vector-with-%: QEMU_OPTS+=-cpu POWER10
+vector: CFLAGS += -mcpu=power10
+run-vector: QEMU_OPTS += -cpu POWER10
+run-plugin-vector-with-%: QEMU_OPTS += -cpu POWER10
+
  PPC64_TESTS += signal_save_restore_xer
  PPC64_TESTS += xxspltw
diff --git a/tests/tcg/ppc64/vector.c b/tests/tcg/ppc64/vector.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3cb2b88c87
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/tcg/ppc64/vector.c
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+int main(void)
+{
+    unsigned int result_wi;
+    vector unsigned char vbc_bi_src = { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF,
+                                        0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0, 0, 0,
+                                        0, 0xFF, 0xFF};
+    vector unsigned short vbc_hi_src = { 0xFFFF, 0, 0, 0xFFFF,
+                                         0, 0, 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF};
+    vector unsigned int vbc_wi_src = {0, 0, 0xFFFFFFFF, 0xFFFFFFFF};
+    vector unsigned long long vbc_di_src = {0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0};
+    vector __uint128_t vbc_qi_src;
+
+    asm("vextractbm %0, %1" : "=r" (result_wi) : "v" (vbc_bi_src));
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
+    assert(result_wi == 0b1101111111000011);
+#else
+    assert(result_wi == 0b1100001111111011);
+#endif
+
+    asm("vextracthm %0, %1" : "=r" (result_wi) : "v" (vbc_hi_src));
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
+    assert(result_wi == 0b10010011);
+#else
+    assert(result_wi == 0b11001001);
+#endif
+
+    asm("vextractwm %0, %1" : "=r" (result_wi) : "v" (vbc_wi_src));
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
+    assert(result_wi == 0b0011);
+#else
+    assert(result_wi == 0b1100);
+#endif
+
+    asm("vextractdm %0, %1" : "=r" (result_wi) : "v" (vbc_di_src));
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
+    assert(result_wi == 0b10);
+#else
+    assert(result_wi == 0b01);
+#endif
+
+    vbc_qi_src[0] = 0x1;
+    vbc_qi_src[0] = vbc_qi_src[0] << 127;
+    asm("vextractqm %0, %1" : "=r" (result_wi) : "v" (vbc_qi_src));
+    assert(result_wi == 0b1);
+
+    return 0;
+}




Reply via email to