On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 6:01 PM Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2023 16:33:10 -0400
> Eric DeVolder <eric.devol...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > Currently i386 QEMU generates MADT revision 3, and reports
> > MADT revision 1. Set .revision to 3 to match reality.
> >
> > Link: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@ora
> > cle.com/T/#t
> > Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devol...@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/i386/acpi-common.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-common.c b/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
> > index 52e5c1439a..8a0932fe84 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
> > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-common.c
> > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void acpi_build_madt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker 
> > *linker,
> >      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(x86ms);
> >      const CPUArchIdList *apic_ids = 
> > mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(MACHINE(x86ms));
> >      AcpiDeviceIfClass *adevc = ACPI_DEVICE_IF_GET_CLASS(adev);
> > -    AcpiTable table = { .sig = "APIC", .rev = 1, .oem_id = oem_id,
> > +    AcpiTable table = { .sig = "APIC", .rev = 3, .oem_id = oem_id,
> >                          .oem_table_id = oem_table_id };
> >
> >      acpi_table_begin(&table, table_data);
>
> make check fails for me at this point
> (my guess is that not all APIC tables are whitelisted)

I think the patchset needs to be rebased and the blobs regenerated.

Reply via email to