On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 12:38 AM Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> Access will fails if access is partially inside the PMP entry.
> However,only set ret = false doesn't really mean pmp violation
> since pmp_hart_has_privs_default() may return true at the end of
> pmp_hart_has_privs().
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqi...@iscas.ac.cn>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/pmp.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/pmp.c b/target/riscv/pmp.c
> index 317c28ba73..1ee8899d04 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/pmp.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/pmp.c
> @@ -327,8 +327,8 @@ bool pmp_hart_has_privs(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong 
> addr,
>          if ((s + e) == 1) {
>              qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
>                            "pmp violation - access is partially inside\n");
> -            ret = false;
> -            break;
> +            *allowed_privs = 0;
> +            return false;
>          }
>
>          /* fully inside */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>

Reply via email to