From: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
This way we can get rid of the if'deffery and the XXX comment
here (it's repeated in the list_cpus() function anyway).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230424122126.236586-1-th...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>
---
linux-user/main.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c
index fe03293516a5..aece4d9e9119 100644
--- a/linux-user/main.c
+++ b/linux-user/main.c
@@ -359,10 +359,7 @@ static void handle_arg_cpu(const char *arg)
{
cpu_model = strdup(arg);
if (cpu_model == NULL || is_help_option(cpu_model)) {
- /* XXX: implement xxx_cpu_list for targets that still miss it */
-#if defined(cpu_list)
- cpu_list();
-#endif
+ list_cpus();
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
--
2.40.1
