On 31/5/23 06:03, Richard Henderson wrote:
Create helper-proto-common.h without the target specific portion.
Use that in tcg-op-common.h.  Include helper-proto.h in target/arm
and target/hexagon before helper-info.c.inc; all other targets are
already correct in this regard.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
---
  include/exec/helper-proto-common.h | 17 +++++++
  include/exec/helper-proto.h        | 72 ++++--------------------------
  include/tcg/tcg-op-common.h        |  2 +-
  include/exec/helper-proto.h.inc    | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  accel/tcg/cputlb.c                 |  3 +-
  accel/tcg/plugin-gen.c             |  2 +-
  accel/tcg/tcg-runtime-gvec.c       |  2 +-
  accel/tcg/tcg-runtime.c            |  2 +-
  target/arm/tcg/translate.c         |  1 +
  target/hexagon/translate.c         |  1 +
  10 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 include/exec/helper-proto-common.h
  create mode 100644 include/exec/helper-proto.h.inc


diff --git a/include/exec/helper-proto.h.inc b/include/exec/helper-proto.h.inc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f6f0cfcacd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/exec/helper-proto.h.inc
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+/*
+ * Helper file for declaring TCG helper functions.
+ * This one expands prototypes for the helper functions.
+ * Define HELPER_H for the header file to be expanded.
+ */
+
+#include "exec/helper-head.h"
+
+/*
+ * Work around an issue with --enable-lto, in which GCC's ipa-split pass
+ * decides to split out the noreturn code paths that raise an exception,
+ * taking the __builtin_return_address() along into the new function,
+ * where it no longer computes a value that returns to TCG generated code.
+ * Despite the name, the noinline attribute affects splitter, so this
+ * prevents the optimization in question.  Given that helpers should not
+ * otherwise be called directly, this should have any other visible effect.
+ *
+ * See https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1454
+ */
+#define DEF_HELPER_ATTR  __attribute__((noinline))
+
+#define DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_0(name, flags, ret) \
+dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (void) DEF_HELPER_ATTR;
+
+#define DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(name, flags, ret, t1) \
+dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (dh_ctype(t1)) DEF_HELPER_ATTR;
+
+#define DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_2(name, flags, ret, t1, t2) \
+dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (dh_ctype(t1), dh_ctype(t2)) DEF_HELPER_ATTR;
+
+#define DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_3(name, flags, ret, t1, t2, t3) \
+dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (dh_ctype(t1), dh_ctype(t2), \
+                            dh_ctype(t3)) DEF_HELPER_ATTR;
+
+#define DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(name, flags, ret, t1, t2, t3, t4) \
+dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (dh_ctype(t1), dh_ctype(t2), dh_ctype(t3), \
+                            dh_ctype(t4)) DEF_HELPER_ATTR;
+
+#define DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(name, flags, ret, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5) \
+dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (dh_ctype(t1), dh_ctype(t2), dh_ctype(t3), \
+                            dh_ctype(t4), dh_ctype(t5)) DEF_HELPER_ATTR;
+
+#define DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_6(name, flags, ret, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6) \
+dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (dh_ctype(t1), dh_ctype(t2), dh_ctype(t3), \
+                            dh_ctype(t4), dh_ctype(t5), \
+                            dh_ctype(t6)) DEF_HELPER_ATTR;
+
+#define DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_7(name, flags, ret, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7) \
+dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (dh_ctype(t1), dh_ctype(t2), dh_ctype(t3), \
+                            dh_ctype(t4), dh_ctype(t5), dh_ctype(t6), \
+                            dh_ctype(t7)) DEF_HELPER_ATTR;
+
+#define IN_HELPER_PROTO
+
+#include HELPER_H
+
+#undef IN_HELPER_PROTO
+
+#undef DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_0
+#undef DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1
+#undef DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_2
+#undef DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_3
+#undef DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4
+#undef DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5
+#undef DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_6
+#undef DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_7
+#undef DEF_HELPER_ATTR

Should we guard this header for multiple inclusions?

Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>


Reply via email to