I see. I think your suggestion makes sense, i.e., groups specified in one
line means intersection of groups, while multiple --group lines mean union
of groups.
BTW, I have moved along and added many new features to risu, including
generating instructions as shared libraries (instead of raw binary files),
multiple instruction sequence, etc. If these are interesting to the
community, I will try to find time and submit. There are a lot of works to
make a proper patch than just making my hack. :)
Jun
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 5:43 AM Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 17:35, Jun Sun <j...@junsun.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Current semantic is a little strange when multiple --group options are
> specified.
> > In this case, only instructions in *all* these groups (i.e.,
> intersection) are used for
> > generation, which is not very useful at all. This patch changes the
> semantic to
> > include all instructions in these groups (i.e., union) for sequence
> generation.
>
> The commit message which added the --group option specifically
> documents a case where it is useful:
>
> ./risugen --group v8.2,Cryptographic aarch64.risu v8.2-crypto.bin
>
> where you want to say "only test the v8.2 crypto insns"
> (i.e. not any crypto insns from other architecture versions,
> and not any non-crypto insns).
> Changing the semantics to union would break this.
>
> Being able to specify that you want insns from multiple
> groups seems like it would be useful, but we should add
> it in a way that doesn't break the existing uses.
>
> One idea that occurs to me is that you could allow
> multiple --group options to mean "union of these"
> and multiple groups within a --group to mean "intersection".
> So for instance
> --group v8.2,Cryptographic --group v8_3_compnum
> would select all the insns that are
> (v8.2 AND cryptographic) OR v8_3_compnum
>
> (This does technically break some existing commandlines
> because the current code makes "--group A --group B"
> do the same thing as "--group A,B".)
>
> Alex, you added the --group option -- what do you think?
>
> > diff --git a/risugen_arm.pm b/risugen_arm.pm
> > index 2dc144d..dc08ec0 100644
> > --- a/risugen_arm.pm
> > +++ b/risugen_arm.pm
> > @@ -1112,6 +1112,7 @@ sub write_test_code($$$$$$$$$)
> > }
> >
> > print "Generating code using patterns: @keys...\n";
> > + print "Total insn patterns : " . $#keys . "\n";
> > progress_start(78, $numinsns);
> >
> > if ($fp_enabled) {
>
> These changes seem unrelated to the --group option.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
