On 6/22/23 13:16, Max Chou wrote:
From: Nazar Kazakov <nazar.kaza...@codethink.co.uk>

Exposes earlier CPU flags allowing the use of the vector cryptography 
extensions.

Signed-off-by: Nazar Kazakov <nazar.kaza...@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.c...@sifive.com>
---
  target/riscv/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++++
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index c1956dc29b..48d584ab0d 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1714,6 +1714,16 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
      DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvfh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvfh, false),
      DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvfhmin", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvfhmin, false),
+ /* Vector cryptography extensions */
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvbb, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvbc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvbc, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvkg", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvkg, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvkned", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvkned, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvknha", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvknha, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvknhb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvknhb, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvksed", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvksed, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvksh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvksh, false),
+

We usually add the cpu properties in the same commit that the extension was
added, e.g. "x-zvbb" would be added by patch 9. This is no hard rule though.

Let's leave this as is and, if a v5 is required for any other reason, you can
put each property into its own patch. For now:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com>

      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
  };

Reply via email to