On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:27:19 +0800
Tao Su <tao1...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:23:05 +0800
> > Tao Su <tao1...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Considering the case of FEAT_7_1_EAX being 0 and FEAT_7_1_EDX being
> > > non-zero,
> > Can you clarify when/why that happens?
>
> When start a VM on GraniteRapids using '-cpu host', we can see two leafs
> CPUID_7_0
> and CPUID_7_1 in VM, because both CPUID_7_1_EAX and CPUID_7_1_EDX have
> non-zero value:
> 0x00000007 0x01: eax=0x00201c30 edx=0x00004000
>
> But if we minus all FEAT_7_1_EAX features using
> '-cpu host,-avx-vnni,-avx512-bf16,-fzrm,-fsrs,-fsrc,-amx-fp16', we can't get
> CPUID_7_1
> leaf even though CPUID_7_1_EDX has non-zero value, so it is necessary to
> update
> cpuid_level_func7 by CPUID_7_1_EDX.
Pls, explain that in commit message.
> Thanks,
> Tao
>
> >
> > > guest may report wrong maximum number sub-leaves in leaf
> > > 07H. So add FEAT_7_1_EDX to adjust feature level.
> > >
> > > Fixes: eaaa197d5b11 ("target/i386: Add support for AVX-VNNI-INT8 in CPUID
> > > enumeration")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tao Su <tao1...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > target/i386/cpu.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > index 1242bd541a..e8a70c35d2 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > @@ -6778,6 +6778,7 @@ void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error
> > > **errp)
> > > x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_6_EAX);
> > > x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_0_ECX);
> > > x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_1_EAX);
> > > + x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_1_EDX);
> > > x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0001_EDX);
> > > x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0001_ECX);
> > > x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0007_EDX);
> >
> >
>
