On 6/30/23 20:46, Warner Losh wrote:


On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 7:22 AM Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org <mailto:richard.hender...@linaro.org>> wrote:

    The previous check returned -1 when any page within
    [start, start+len) is unmapped, not when all are unmapped.

    Cc: Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com <mailto:i...@bsdimp.com>>
    Cc: Kyle Evans <kev...@freebsd.org <mailto:kev...@freebsd.org>>
    Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org
    <mailto:richard.hender...@linaro.org>>
    ---
      bsd-user/mmap.c | 2 +-
      1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

    diff --git a/bsd-user/mmap.c b/bsd-user/mmap.c
    index 565b9f97ed..07b5b8055e 100644
    --- a/bsd-user/mmap.c
    +++ b/bsd-user/mmap.c
    @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ abi_long target_mmap(abi_ulong start, abi_ulong len, 
int prot,
              }

              /* Reject the mapping if any page within the range is mapped */
    -        if ((flags & MAP_EXCL) && page_check_range(start, len, 0) < 0) {
    +        if ((flags & MAP_EXCL) && !page_check_range_empty(start, end - 1)) 
{


Won't computing end overflow if start is 1<<32 - len? Then subtracting one here would be too late.

-fwrapv, so fully twos-compliment.

So start per above, end == 0, end - 1 == UINT32_MAX.

See also the rest of the linux-user code, wherein I work with "last == end - 1".
Which has the advantage of preserving comparison order: start < last.


r~

Reply via email to