On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 at 01:20, Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 8:41 AM Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > > > In handle_interrupt() we use level as an index into the interrupt_vector[] > > array. This is safe because we have checked it against env->config->nlevel, > > but Coverity can't see that (and it is only true because each CPU config > > sets its XCHAL_NUM_INTLEVELS to something less than MAX_NLEVELS), so it > > complains about a possible array overrun (CID 1507131) > > > > Add an assert() which will make Coverity happy and catch the unlikely > > case of a mis-set XCHAL_NUM_INTLEVELS in future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > --- > > NB: only tested with 'make check-avocado'. You could argue that we > > should mark the coverity issue as false-positive instead if you like. > > --- > > target/xtensa/exc_helper.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com>
Thanks. I'll take it via target-arm since I'm doing a pullreq anyway, unless you'd prefer otherwise. -- PMM
