On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 8:17 PM ~rlakshmibai <rlakshmi...@git.sr.ht> wrote:
>
> From: Lakshmi Bai Raja Subramanian 
> <lakshmi.bai.rajasubraman...@bodhicomputing.com>
>
> fdt_load_addr is declared as uint32_t which is not matching with the
> return data type of riscv_compute_fdt_addr. Modified fdt_load_addr data type
> to uint64_t to match the riscv_compute_fdt_addr() return data type. This fix
> also helps in calculating the right fdt address when DRAM is mapped to higher
> 64-bit address.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Bai Raja Subramanian 
> <lakshmi.bai.rajasubraman...@bodhicomputing.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  hw/riscv/virt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/virt.c b/hw/riscv/virt.c
> index 95708d890e..c348529ac0 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/virt.c
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static void virt_machine_done(Notifier *notifier, void 
> *data)
>      target_ulong start_addr = memmap[VIRT_DRAM].base;
>      target_ulong firmware_end_addr, kernel_start_addr;
>      const char *firmware_name = riscv_default_firmware_name(&s->soc[0]);
> -    uint32_t fdt_load_addr;
> +    uint64_t fdt_load_addr;
>      uint64_t kernel_entry = 0;
>      BlockBackend *pflash_blk0;
>
> --
> 2.38.5
>

Reply via email to