On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 5:03 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Yong Huang <yong.hu...@smartx.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:26 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Yong Huang <yong.hu...@smartx.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 7:04 PM Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Yong Huang <yong.hu...@smartx.com> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:44 PM Markus Armbruster <
> arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> >> Yes, please.  But before that, I have still more questions.  "This
> >> >> algorithm only works when vCPU's dirtyrate greater than
> >> >> 'vcpu-dirty-limit'" is a condition: "FEATURE only works when
> CONDITION".
> >> >>
> >> > I failed to express my meaning again : ( .  "Throttle algo only works
> when
> >> > vCPU's  dirtyrate greater than 'vcpu-dirty-limit' " should change to
> >> > "vCPU throttle only works when vCPU's dirtyrate greater than
> >> > 'vcpu-dirty-limit'".
> >> > Not the whole "algo" !
> >>
> >> Let me paraphrase to make sure I got it...  The vCPU is throttled as
> >> needed to keep its dirty rate within the limit set with
> >> set-vcpu-dirty-limit.  Correct?
> >>
> > Yes. Actually set with the internal function qmp_set_vcpu_dirty_limit.
> >
> > And a parameter called "vcpu-dirty-limit"  of migration provided by
> > dirty-limit
> > aims to be the argument of qmp_set_vcpu_dirty_limit.
>
> Alright, let me try to craft some documentation:
>
>   # @dirty-limit: If enabled, migration will throttle vCPUs as needed to
>   #     keep their dirty page rate within @vcpu-dirty-limit.  This can
>   #     improve responsiveness of large guests during live migration,
>   #     and can result in more stable read performance.  Requires KVM
>   #     with accelerator property "dirty-ring-size" set.  (Since 8.1)
>
> What do you think?
>
I feel ok, it seems clear and concise.
I'll use this comment in the next version. Thanks a lot. :)

>
> >> What happens when I enable the dirty limit convergence algorithm without
> >> setting a limit with set-vcpu-dirty-limit?
> >>
> > dirty-limit will use the default value which is defined
> > in migration/options.c:
> > #define DEFAULT_MIGRATE_VCPU_DIRTY_LIMIT            1       /* MB/s */
> >
> > So the default of the dirty-limit is 1MB/s.
>
> Is this default documented in the QAPI schema?  Hmm, looks like it isn't
> before this series, but PATCH 3 fixes it.  Okay.
>
> >> >> What happens when the condition is not met?  How can the user ensure
> the
> >> >> condition is met?
> >> >>
> >> >> [...]
>
>

-- 
Best regards

Reply via email to