On 21/7/23 11:46, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 10:16, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 20/7/23 17:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
This patchset was prompted by a couple of Coverity warnings
(CID 1507157, 1517772) which note that in the m48t59 RTC device model
we keep an offset in a time_t variable but then truncate it by
passing it to qemu_get_timedate(), which currently uses an 'int'
argument for its offset parameter.
We can fix the Coverity complaint by making qemu_get_timedate()
take a time_t; we should also correspondingly make the
qemu_timedate_diff() function return a time_t. However this
will only push the issue out to callers of qemu_timedate_diff()
if they are putting the result in a 32-bit variable or doing
32-bit arithmetic on it.
Luckily there aren't that many callers of qemu_timedate_diff()
and most of them already use either time_t or int64_t for the
calculations they do on its return value. The first three
patches fix devices which weren't doing that; patch four then
fixes the rtc.c functions. If I missed any callsites in devices
then hopefully Coverity will point them out.
PL031State::tick_offset is uint32_t, and pl031_get_count() also
returns that type. Is that expected?
I think those fall into the category of "the device we are
modelling does not support 64-bit timestamps" -- the PL031
RTC_DR register is only 32 bits.
Good, thanks for confirming.
