Hi Zhao,
On 8/1/23 05:35, Zhao Liu wrote:
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1....@intel.com>
>
> Refer to the fixes of cache_info_passthrough ([1], [2]) and SDM, the
> CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 25:14] and CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26] should use the
> nearest power-of-2 integer.
>
> The nearest power-of-2 integer can be caculated by pow2ceil() or by
> using APIC ID offset (like L3 topology using 1 << die_offset [3]).
>
> But in fact, CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 25:14] and CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26]
> are associated with APIC ID. For example, in linux kernel, the field
> "num_threads_sharing" (Bits 25 - 14) is parsed with APIC ID. And for
> another example, on Alder Lake P, the CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26] is not
> matched with actual core numbers and it's caculated by:
> "(1 << (pkg_offset - core_offset)) - 1".
>
> Therefore the offset of APIC ID should be preferred to caculate nearest
> power-of-2 integer for CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 25:14] and CPUID.04H:EAX[bits
> 31:26]:
> 1. d/i cache is shared in a core, 1 << core_offset should be used
> instand of "cs->nr_threads" in encode_cache_cpuid4() for
> CPUID.04H.00H:EAX[bits 25:14] and CPUID.04H.01H:EAX[bits 25:14].
> 2. L2 cache is supposed to be shared in a core as for now, thereby
> 1 << core_offset should also be used instand of "cs->nr_threads" in
> encode_cache_cpuid4() for CPUID.04H.02H:EAX[bits 25:14].
> 3. Similarly, the value for CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26] should also be
> replaced by the offsets upper SMT level in APIC ID.
>
> In addition, use APIC ID offset to replace "pow2ceil()" for
> cache_info_passthrough case.
>
> [1]: efb3934adf9e ("x86: cpu: make sure number of addressable IDs for
> processor cores meets the spec")
> [2]: d7caf13b5fcf ("x86: cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical
> processors sharing cache")
> [3]: d65af288a84d ("i386: Update new x86_apicid parsing rules with die_offset
> support")
>
> Fixes: 7e3482f82480 ("i386: Helpers to encode cache information consistently")
> Suggested-by: Robert Hoo <robert...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1....@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> * Use APIC ID offset to replace "pow2ceil()" for cache_info_passthrough
> case. (Yanan)
> * Split the L1 cache fix into a separate patch.
> * Rename the title of this patch (the original is "i386/cpu: Fix number
> of addressable IDs in CPUID.04H").
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index b439a05244ee..c80613bfcded 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -6005,7 +6005,6 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index,
> uint32_t count,
> {
> X86CPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
> - uint32_t die_offset;
> uint32_t limit;
> uint32_t signature[3];
> X86CPUTopoInfo topo_info;
> @@ -6089,39 +6088,56 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index,
> uint32_t count,
> int host_vcpus_per_cache = 1 + ((*eax & 0x3FFC000) >> 14);
> int vcpus_per_socket = cs->nr_cores * cs->nr_threads;
> if (cs->nr_cores > 1) {
> + int addressable_cores_offset =
> +
> apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info) -
> +
> apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> +
> *eax &= ~0xFC000000;
> - *eax |= (pow2ceil(cs->nr_cores) - 1) << 26;
> + *eax |= (1 << addressable_cores_offset - 1) << 26;
> }
> if (host_vcpus_per_cache > vcpus_per_socket) {
> + int pkg_offset = apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info);
> +
> *eax &= ~0x3FFC000;
> - *eax |= (pow2ceil(vcpus_per_socket) - 1) << 14;
> + *eax |= (1 << pkg_offset - 1) << 14;
> }
> }
I hit this compile error with this patch.
[1/18] Generating qemu-version.h with a custom command (wrapped by meson
to capture output)
[2/4] Compiling C object libqemu-x86_64-softmmu.fa.p/target_i386_cpu.c.o
FAILED: libqemu-x86_64-softmmu.fa.p/target_i386_cpu.c.o
..
..
softmmu.fa.p/target_i386_cpu.c.o -c ../target/i386/cpu.c
../target/i386/cpu.c: In function ‘cpu_x86_cpuid’:
../target/i386/cpu.c:6096:60: error: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ inside
‘<<’ [-Werror=parentheses]
6096 | *eax |= (1 << addressable_cores_offset - 1) << 26;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
../target/i386/cpu.c:6102:46: error: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ inside
‘<<’ [-Werror=parentheses]
6102 | *eax |= (1 << pkg_offset - 1) << 14;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Please fix this.
Thanks
Babu
> } else if (cpu->vendor_cpuid_only && IS_AMD_CPU(env)) {
> *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
> } else {
> *eax = 0;
> + int addressable_cores_offset = apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info) -
> + apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> + int core_offset, die_offset;
> +
> switch (count) {
> case 0: /* L1 dcache info */
> + core_offset = apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l1d_cache,
> - cs->nr_threads, cs->nr_cores,
> + (1 << core_offset),
> + (1 << addressable_cores_offset),
> eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> case 1: /* L1 icache info */
> + core_offset = apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l1i_cache,
> - cs->nr_threads, cs->nr_cores,
> + (1 << core_offset),
> + (1 << addressable_cores_offset),
> eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> case 2: /* L2 cache info */
> + core_offset = apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l2_cache,
> - cs->nr_threads, cs->nr_cores,
> + (1 << core_offset),
> + (1 << addressable_cores_offset),
> eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> case 3: /* L3 cache info */
> die_offset = apicid_die_offset(&topo_info);
> if (cpu->enable_l3_cache) {
> encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l3_cache,
> - (1 << die_offset), cs->nr_cores,
> + (1 << die_offset),
> + (1 << addressable_cores_offset),
> eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> }
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
