On 8/5/23 01:03, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Add a small test to prevent regressions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target |  1 +
>  tests/tcg/s390x/vxeh2_vstrs.c   | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/vxeh2_vstrs.c
> 
> diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> index 1fc98099070..8ba36e5985b 100644
> --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ ifneq ($(CROSS_CC_HAS_Z15),)
>  Z15_TESTS=vxeh2_vs
>  Z15_TESTS+=vxeh2_vcvt
>  Z15_TESTS+=vxeh2_vlstr
> +Z15_TESTS+=vxeh2_vstrs
>  $(Z15_TESTS): CFLAGS+=-march=z15 -O2
>  TESTS+=$(Z15_TESTS)
>  endif
> diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/vxeh2_vstrs.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/vxeh2_vstrs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..313ec1d728f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/vxeh2_vstrs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +/*
> + * Test the VSTRS instruction.
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> + */
> +#include <assert.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include "vx.h"
> +
> +static inline __attribute__((__always_inline__)) int
> +vstrs(S390Vector *v1, const S390Vector *v2, const S390Vector *v3,
> +      const S390Vector *v4, const uint8_t m5, const uint8_t m6)
> +{
> +    int cc;
> +
> +    asm("vstrs %[v1],%[v2],%[v3],%[v4],%[m5],%[m6]\n"
> +        "ipm %[cc]"
> +        : [v1] "=v" (v1->v)
> +        , [cc] "=r" (cc)
> +        : [v2] "v" (v2->v)
> +        , [v3] "v" (v3->v)
> +        , [v4] "v" (v4->v)
> +        , [m5] "i" (m5)
> +        , [m6]  "i" (m6)
> +        : "cc");
> +
> +    return (cc >> 28) & 3;
Following the POp, I am puzzled by the use of an "int" to contain the register 
result of the IPM instruction, should it not be a 64bit variable?
bits 0-31 are left unchanged / are uninteresting, is that enough to avoid 
having to use a properly sized variable?

I see that this is done elsewhere in the tests (sometimes a 64bit variable is 
used, sometimes just 'int'), so I assume it's probably fine.

Otherwise lgtm,

Claudio


> +}
> +
> +static void test_ignored_match(void)
> +{
> +    S390Vector v1;
> +    S390Vector v2 = {.d[0] = 0x222000205e410000ULL, .d[1] = 0};
> +    S390Vector v3 = {.d[0] = 0x205e410000000000ULL, .d[1] = 0};
> +    S390Vector v4 = {.d[0] = 3, .d[1] = 0};
> +
> +    assert(vstrs(&v1, &v2, &v3, &v4, 0, 2) == 1);
> +    assert(v1.d[0] == 16);
> +    assert(v1.d[1] == 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_empty_needle(void)
> +{
> +    S390Vector v1;
> +    S390Vector v2 = {.d[0] = 0x5300000000000000ULL, .d[1] = 0};
> +    S390Vector v3 = {.d[0] = 0, .d[1] = 0};
> +    S390Vector v4 = {.d[0] = 0, .d[1] = 0};
> +
> +    assert(vstrs(&v1, &v2, &v3, &v4, 0, 0) == 2);
> +    assert(v1.d[0] == 0);
> +    assert(v1.d[1] == 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_max_length(void)
> +{
> +    S390Vector v1;
> +    S390Vector v2 = {.d[0] = 0x1122334455667700ULL, .d[1] = 0};
> +    S390Vector v3 = {.d[0] = 0, .d[1] = 0};
> +    S390Vector v4 = {.d[0] = 16, .d[1] = 0};
> +
> +    assert(vstrs(&v1, &v2, &v3, &v4, 0, 0) == 3);
> +    assert(v1.d[0] == 7);
> +    assert(v1.d[1] == 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_no_match(void)
> +{
> +    S390Vector v1;
> +    S390Vector v2 = {.d[0] = 0xffffff000fffff00ULL, .d[1] = 0x82b};
> +    S390Vector v3 = {.d[0] = 0xfffffffeffffffffULL,
> +                     .d[1] = 0xffffffff00000000ULL};
> +    S390Vector v4 = {.d[0] = 11, .d[1] = 0};
> +
> +    assert(vstrs(&v1, &v2, &v3, &v4, 0, 2) == 1);
> +    assert(v1.d[0] == 16);
> +    assert(v1.d[1] == 0);
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> +    test_ignored_match();
> +    test_empty_needle();
> +    test_max_length();
> +    test_no_match();
> +    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
> +}


Reply via email to